![]() ![]() Miller SAGE Publications, Social Science - 88 pages 0 Reviews Reviews arent verified, but Google. Finally, the validity and reliability of PRA are discussed in relation to arguments about sequencing/triangulating research techniques, an argument which is shown to be as problematic as the unexamined use of PRA. Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research Jerome Kirk, Marc L. It then turns to the problems that arise from using PRA techniques. Start reading Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research for free online and get access to an unlimited library of academic and non-fiction books on Perlego. This paper looks at the development of participatory rural appraisal (PRA) in development research, and critically examines three methods-interviewing, visualization, and ranking/scoring-in terms of their relation to established qualitative research. Validity/credibility is concerned with research framework, whereas reliability/dependability refers to the range of stability in observations, objectivity/. ![]() Such issues, when taken together with the problem of combining participatory with qualitative and quantitative research, argue strongly not only for caution in using the methods but also for the need to undertake basic research on participatory methods themselves. While aware of the potential advantages of such methods, this paper outlines a number of methodological issues that need to be carefully considered. Anthropologists and many others are making increasing use of participatory research methods in a variety of applied contexts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |